![win xp home edition ulcpc youtube win xp home edition ulcpc youtube](https://http2.mlstatic.com/D_NQ_NP_660381-MLB33040481709_112019-O.jpg)
- #WIN XP HOME EDITION ULCPC YOUTUBE PORTABLE#
- #WIN XP HOME EDITION ULCPC YOUTUBE PC#
- #WIN XP HOME EDITION ULCPC YOUTUBE WINDOWS#
The situation is about to get a little more complicated with the arrival of CULV (Consumer Ultra Low Voltage) systems such as the Acer Timeline range. But as a matter of fact, most netbooks fit all three of the definitions above.
![win xp home edition ulcpc youtube win xp home edition ulcpc youtube](http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww246/indo-virgin/OS/HP1.jpg)
In the end, you just have to accept that life is fuzzy: there is no hard and fast definition of a netbook.
#WIN XP HOME EDITION ULCPC YOUTUBE PC#
It's made by Asus's laptop division, not its Eee PC division.
#WIN XP HOME EDITION ULCPC YOUTUBE PORTABLE#
The Asus N10 isn't a netbook either it's a portable PC, even though it does have an Atom processor.
#WIN XP HOME EDITION ULCPC YOUTUBE WINDOWS#
It's right: it doesn't have an Atom processor or a ULCPC copy of Windows XP. The Sony P Series, for example, is not a netbook because Sony says so. The third definition actually trumps the other two: a netbook is anything the manufacturer decides to call a netbook. It just happened to arrive when PC manufacturers were looking for small cheap chips for netbooks. It was targeted at delivering all-day use with systems that have 4-6 inch screens - just a bit below Intel's UMPC (Ultra Mobile PC), aka Microsoft's Origami, which targeted 5-7 inch screens. The Atom's limitations make sense because it was designed for use in what Intel calls MIDs, for Mobile Internet Devices. (Indeed, much more powerful Atom chips are on the way, though it remains to be seen just how far Intel will push the design.) Most ordinary people don't run demanding desktop applications, unless they're into video processing or gaming, and they don't actually do much multi-tasking so an Atom is often good enough. The Atom wins in power consumption (4W instead of 65W). Another major drawback with the Atom is that it can't handle out-of-order instructions. If you want to run large applications, or multi-task, then you're much better off with a 64-bit Core 2 Duo (410 million transistors, 3MB L2 cache) than a 32-bit Atom (47m transistors, 512K L2 cache). The Intel Atom chip is suitable for netbooks because it is small, cheap and very efficient (long battery life) but not very powerful. The problem is that a big screen will use more power (shortening battery life) and be much less portable than a small screen, so netbooks will tend to have smaller screens than notebooks. Under this definition, it doesn't matter what the screen size is. It is optimised for long battery life, not for performance.
![win xp home edition ulcpc youtube win xp home edition ulcpc youtube](https://blog-imgs-26-origin.fc2.com/l/i/v/livinginjapan/system.jpg)
It is not designed to run large desktop applications, and certainly not for multi-tasking them. A netbook is a cheap portable computer that is suitable for using net-based applications such as Gmail and Zoho. The second definition of a netbook is a functional one. However, if they want to load it with XP Home ULCPC at about a third of the price of Vista, they have to meet the ULCPC spec, just as they would for Tablet PC Edition or whatever. They can load it with any operating system they choose, if it's legally available. Of course, PC manufacturers can make any type of portable PC they like, with whatever specification they want. Allowing 13.3in screens would hit most PC manufacturers' profits, not just Microsoft's. But this is unlikely, because most PC manufacturers charge less for netbooks than they do for notebooks, and they make less money on them. If it did, there would be a flood of 13.3in netbooks.
![win xp home edition ulcpc youtube win xp home edition ulcpc youtube](http://www.nbprice.ru/files/nodus_items/0021/10640/attaches/eeepc1000h22.jpg)
If Microsoft decided to change the definition again – under pressure from its PC partners, perhaps - it could allow screen sizes up to 13.3 inches. It used to allow an 80GB hard drive and screen sizes up to 10 inches. This definition has changed since it first appeared. However, looking at netbooks on the market, it clearly allows for an Intel Atom processor (there are alternatives), 1GB of memory, a 160GB hard drive and a 12-inch screen. Since we're not Microsoft customers, we don't know exactly what this definition entails. And there are at least three key definitions.įirst, a netbook is a cheap portable computer that fits the definition of an ULCPC (ultra-low cost personal computer), under which Microsoft provides a cheap version called Windows XP Home Edition ULCPC, optimised for small machines. I've been asked a reasonable question: "How big a screen means you're not a netbook any more?" The answer, of course, is that it depends how you define a netbook.